The fourth kind real footage abigail tyler

The fourth kind real footage abigail tyler

My question is, and maybe some of you might know this? Will quicktime after this update use the GPU to decode the H264 stuff or will it still be software based decoding. Quicktime does not even have the capability to decode High Profile H. 264 video right now. Only Base and Main Profiles are supported. Bluray uses High Profile. Also to anyone that compares video streaming and calling it high quality are completely out of touch with what Bluray has to offer. Bluray offer 1920×1080 24p with H. 264 or VC-1 or even MPEG-2 with bitrates as high as 40Mbps. The audio can be as high as 20Mbps. Yes you read that right. I have a concert BD that uses 1 channel 24-bit/96kHz PCM for an audio only bitrate of 6Mbps. If you guys want to compare this kind of capability with a 5Mbps or 6Mbps HD stream for both audio and video, I pity you guys. Bluray makes a huge difference when it comes to displaying on a big screen and a good audio environment. Yes, this is not how majority of people watch home A/V, but again we are talking about high quality here, not lowest common denominator. My setup is a 1080p projector Epson 1080UB with native 24p support as well as 60p, 118 diagonal screen, Harman Kardon AVR 745, Klipsch Reference series speakers, Elemental Designs A3/350 subwoofer, PS3 for DVDs and Blurays, iMac for ripped DVDs, Dish ViP Restricting customer choices. iTune monopoly on content. Not giving a amn about computers anymore. Blu-ray discs arent thin enough. 😀 I am a mac guy at home. I use PC only at work. I have an imac right now. However, I think Apple is severely behind in the laptop market now. They used to be about equal. When companies like Sony can sell a pretty good looking laptop with Bluray drive built-in as well as HDMI out, webcam, etc for the same price as a MacBook, it bothers me. Blu-ray discs arent thin enough. 😀 People wanted to make DVDs half as thick to fit better into magazines the fourth kind real footage abigail tyler make it more environment-friendly. A DVD only uses half of its thickness for data the reflecting material is sandwitched between two acrylic discs, so you could just put the label onto the reflective material like CDs and make it half as thick. But these discs turned out to be very floppy and thus destroy disc drives they were put in rather quickly. It would probably work fine when you keep the thickness on the center part and have a thinner, but harder material like glass for the data. But if youve handled a glass CD negative used for stamp-pressing CDs, you know how awkward, heavy and fragile they are. PS: I obtained an IBM CPU-Wafer from an IT exposition once because It looked awesome as a mousepad.